diff --git a/textual-description/description.out b/textual-description/description.out index 85afa6b0..8ccc5dee 100644 --- a/textual-description/description.out +++ b/textual-description/description.out @@ -7,4 +7,5 @@ \BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.1}{\376\377\000D\000e\000s\000c\000r\000i\000p\000t\000i\000o\000n}{chapter.2}% 7 \BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.2.1.1}{\376\377\000R\000e\000l\000a\000t\000i\000o\000n\000s\000h\000i\000p\000\040\000d\000e\000s\000c\000r\000i\000p\000t\000i\000o\000n}{section.2.1}% 8 \BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.2.1.2}{\376\377\000E\000n\000t\000i\000t\000i\000e\000s\000\040\000a\000n\000d\000\040\000a\000t\000t\000r\000i\000b\000u\000t\000e\000s\000\040\000d\000e\000s\000c\000r\000i\000p\000t\000i\000o\000n}{section.2.1}% 9 -\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.2.1.3}{\376\377\000R\000e\000l\000a\000t\000i\000o\000n\000a\000l\000\040\000d\000i\000a\000g\000r\000a\000m}{section.2.1}% 10 +\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.3}{\376\377\000T\000a\000s\000k\000\040\0003\000\040\000-\000\040\000R\000e\000l\000a\000t\000i\000o\000n\000a\000l\000\040\000d\000i\000a\000g\000r\000a\000m}{}% 10 +\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.3.1}{\376\377\000D\000e\000s\000c\000r\000i\000p\000t\000i\000o\000n}{chapter.3}% 11 diff --git a/textual-description/description.pdf b/textual-description/description.pdf index 3c7a81d4..4034f0e6 100644 Binary files a/textual-description/description.pdf and b/textual-description/description.pdf differ diff --git a/textual-description/description.tex b/textual-description/description.tex index 54eb8e70..671d90e2 100644 --- a/textual-description/description.tex +++ b/textual-description/description.tex @@ -164,10 +164,20 @@ Player entity represents Player object from \hyperref[Objects Section]{Objects S \item transfer value - how much the Player is worth \end{itemize} -\subsection{Relational diagram} -\paragraph{Description} +\chapter{Task 3 - Relational diagram} +\section{Description} A relational diagram was generated using SQL developer. The most notable aspects of it are:\\ -- Entities remain the same as in the logical diagram, they are now described with higher details written by the generation.\\ +\\ +\paragraph{Entities descriptions} +How entities changed, from logical diagram:\\ +- STADIUM - Nothing of note changed, but now types of attributes and stored relations with other entities are displayed.\\ +- COMPETITION - Nothing of note changed, but now types of attributes are displayed.\\ +- MANAGER - Nothing of note changed, but now types of attributes and stored relations with other entities are displayed.\\ +- CLUB - Nothing of note changed, but now types of attributes and stored relations with other entities are displayed.\\ +- MATCH - Nothing of note changed, but now types of attributes and stored relations with other entities are displayed.\\ +- PLAYER - Nothing of note changed, but now types of attributes and stored relations with other entities are displayed.\\ +\paragraph{Relations descriptions} +How relations changed from logical diagram.\\ - Most of the relations remained visually the same aside from three, those are:\\ - STADIUM:COMPETITION-takes\_place\_in along with CLUB:MATCH-takes\_part\_in have been separated into a relational block based on the fact that those are N:M relations\\ - MANAGER:CLUB-works was disjoined into two relations due to the original relation being 1:1 with identity